Sunday, June 13, 2010

Racebending and Ethnicity Issues in Hollywood



If you haven't read my earlier essay that discussed Avatar: The Last Airbender, allow me to fill you in on some of the show's core concepts - by quoting the monologue that begins every episode:

"Water.. Earth.. Fire.. Air.. Long ago, the four nations lived together in harmony. Then everything changed when the Fire Nation attacked. Only the Avatar, master of all four elements, could stop them but when the world needed him most, he vanished. A hundred years passed and my brother and I discovered the new Avatar, an airbender named Aang. And although his airbending skills are great, he still has a lot to learn before he's ready to save anyone. But I believe Aang can save the world..."

So that's that. It's a pretty straightforward epic fantasy story, albeit extremely well-done for a kids' show. Now, the animation style is strongly influenced by Japanese anime rather than "typical" American animation. However, in addition to that, almost every element within the series' universe is borrowed from various Asian cultures. The written language of all four nations is Chinese calligraphy - a point which the producers felt was so important to get right that they hired an expert. Each nation has its own form of martial art/elemental control, each of which is essentially a real-world Asian martial art with magic added: Airbending is Bagua, Waterbending is Tai Chi, Firebending is Shaolin, and Earthbending is Hung Ga. They got an expert for that one, too. In terms of visual culture - architecture, clothing, hairstyles, and even skin tones - the Fire Nation resembles primarily Tang Dynasty China, the Earth Kingdom draws from both Qing Dynasty China and Korea, and the Air Nomads are mostly Tibetan-inspired. The Water Tribe, which is mostly informed by Inuit culture, is kind of the odd one out. Even so, can we agree that the show has very little caucasian influence, aside from the language spoken? Good.

....But now they're making a movie of it, and things are going awry.


What's wrong with this picture?

You may notice that the three protagonists - two of whom were downright dark-skinned, and one of whom was certainly intended to be Asian - are white. The antagonist - who, in the series, may have had the most strongly Asian facial features - is brown. The problems with this are twofold. First, and most broadly, it reinforces the common Hollywood trope of white heroes versus "ethnic" villains. It would be easier to ignore this if not for the fact that all Fire Nation characters are now dark-skinned (the four main antagonists of the film being played by actors of Indian, Maori, and Iranian descent). The fact that a large number of non-white actors are playing prominent, non-stereotyped, complex characters in a major movie is generally a good sign. However, the apparent divide between the light-skinned good guys and the dark-skinned bad guys is concerning, to say the least.

 Three more characters on the antagonist side of things, and their live-action actors.

Second, and perhaps more unfortunately, three characters which could have provided breakout roles for Inuit or Asian actors have been cast with white actors. Try and think of as many Asian characters in films and TV shows as you can. How many of them are defined by their race, or have their ethnicity frequently referenced in-story? How many are associated with common Asian stereotypes like martial arts expert, math whiz, overbearing parent, musical genius, or wise elderly person? How many are main characters? Compared to white actors, it is much more difficult for an aspiring non-white actor to find a non-stereotypical, non-one-dimensional role. Only 1.8% of lead roles go to Asian actors, and only 1% go to Native American actors. This issue is, unfortunately, self-sustaining: Hollywood believes that audiences will always prefer a white main character over an Asian or Native American main character, which means that Hollywood never makes any movies with Asian or Native American main characters that might help the audiences get used to the idea. 

There's a little too much of this in movies.

The most interesting thing about this, to me, is that The Last Airbender will be directed by M. Night Shyamalan, who is Indian-American. Was the largely-white casting intentional? Shyamalan says that he believes the source material to be "ambiguous." Despite the Asian cultural cues, he believes that the characters themselves are a mix of all sorts of ethnic features, so there could have been plenty of variety in the casting. “My daughter looks at Katara [the lead Water Tribe girl] and sees herself,” Shyamalan said “but her [non-South Indian] friends see themselves.” Shyamalan has also said that he likes the idea of each nation having similar ethnic features within the group: Fire Nation is Indo-Arabic, Water Tribe is European, Earth Nation is Asian after all (with a smattering of black characters mixed in, oddly enough), and Air Nomads are mixed-race. Fair enough...but then again, a lot of the background extras in the Water Tribe are played by Native Americans, as they appeared to be in the cartoon. Why are only the lead-role Water Tribe characters white? And even if Noah Ringer (who plays Aang, the titular Airbender) is mixed-race, his features appear white to the untrained eye - and if audiences don't know going in that he's half-Asian, then they will simply perceive him as white as well.

Shyamalan himself.

Some people are saying that, well, maybe the casting was completely colorblind. Maybe they just chose the best actor for each role, and it just happened to turn out that the best auditions were white actors. That kind of thinking would be a step in the direction of a truly post-racial society wherein race does not enter into the equation at all. It would be a bummer that the Asian-inspired characters weren't played by Asian actors, but at least we would know that there wasn't any prejudice involved. Sadly, we are not in a post-racial society. Case in point: when the casting call for all the major roles in The Last Airbender went out, they requested actors of "Caucasian or other ethnicity." That is, the casting director strongly hinted that they wanted white actors - anyone else could try, but they would be secondary. 

 At least they haven't completely scrubbed the Asian visual cues...

I am a die-hard fan of the type that wants to see everything related to the source material. There are plenty of die-hard fans of another type: those who will not tolerate the injustices being committed against the characters and the Asian- and Native-American communities. I see their point of view, and respect it, but as much as these racial issues bother me, I still plan to see the film. I've never been a boycotting type of guy. Plus, I want the movie to do well enough to justify making the two planned sequels - sequels that will explore the idea that "good" and "evil" are not easy generalizations to make, and that most people in the fire nation are good people (even those who may be perceived as villains in the first movie). That theme ought to provide some redemption for the whitewashing in the casting process. We'll see how it all plays out, I guess. 

The Last Airbender was a perfect opportunity to have an entirely non-Caucasian cast in a blockbuster film with a pre-existing fanbase to give it support. It could have been a chance for people with a wide range of ethnicities to see People Like Them being heroic on the big screen, instead of playing second fiddle to a white dude. And if that movie had done well - which it probably would have - then maybe non-white people would see movies starring People Like Them more often.

 
 Check out Racebending for a more in-depth exploration of many of these themes.

28 comments:

  1. I'm not necessarily a boycotting kind of girl either, but I'm definitely with the camp of people who are outraged, because this is obviously not "colorblindness," but simply racial preference (a.k.a. racism) of the systematic kind, i.e. whites > everyone else. I mean, come on, you saw the casting call.

    Obviously, the people of the Avatar universe have a different (albeit fictional) history than we do here on lovely Earth. They seem to be more divided amongst 'National'-lines, than race, gender, &c. Without a history of White supremacy, colonialism, imperialism, racism, genocide, and so on, maybe it would be more likely to have many differently toned people hangin' together and doin' the thing. But, the kicker with this is, that Avatar was created by people whose lenses were Western/Earthly. And those calling for actors for the film are no different.

    This is simply an explicit example of the still-pervasive ideas of racial superiority, as well as accessibility.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It is also bad because of the whole fiasco with extras. "If you are white you can drape a scarf around your head to look like a Ukrainian villager." Embarrassing.

    It's as if they see the important role of racial harmony in the show and think, "yeah! Let's have lots of races! Except the main characters. Whiiite."

    ReplyDelete
  3. I've heard this argument a lot and when I first started considering it, it irked me to the max (especially the bit about the casting call).

    Katara and Sakka are...horrible, nobody's going to deny that.

    But Aang...sorta looks like the cartoon Aang, regardless of race. He's also a first degree black belt in taekwondo at twelve (how many of those are there?). He just sorta seems...perfect to play Aang, depending on his acting chops of course.

    And Zuko is being played by an aspiring, up and coming actor in Dev Patel. He's also not evil, the second...no FIRST most important character of the show, by FAR the most complicated and interesting and being portrayed by the least white person in the main cast.

    Again, Sokka and Katara are bullshit racist, no denying it. But for what it's worth, I don't see the problem with Aang or Zuko here. I just hope in the next movie, Toph isn't played by Dakota Fanning. That's something even I would boycott...

    ReplyDelete
  4. I feel like I was amongst the first to be disappointed by the casting choices for this movie, but now I am feeling somewhat defensive as criticisms of the movie have begun to spill over to include my favorite show. I can't really agree with what Tabitha said regarding paternal western ethnocentrism. I have never understood Avatar: The Last Airbender as anything other than paying homage to cultures that inspired elements of the fictional cultures portrayed on the show. The show has never claimed to be anything other than american. If incorporating (brilliantly, I might add) alternative cultural norms, philosophies, and traditions is racist, as opposed to misrepresenting them, stereotyping them, or not portraying them at all, then anything (seriously, anything) made by western white people is racist, and that doesn't really seem like a fair standard to me. I don't think having american voice actors for an american show screams racist. It might work against salient normative views to incorporate some linguistic diversity in the main cast, but the cultures ARE fictional. The show is not misrepresenting any specific ethnic group with western voice actors; I will say again, the show is american. If I was going to complain about anything, it would be that all of the American actors had the same midwestern accent.

    And for what it's worth, I do not read the casting choice for Aang as white, so I am not particularly upset at that selection. I'm almost offended at the implication that he "isn't asian enough." There is an implicit hypocrisy in simultaneously addressing racial homogeny and ascribing ethnicity based on appearance.

    Regarding "antagonists" being non-white, this I almost agree with. But Zuko, at his worst, is an antihero. He becomes fully developed, and the audience roots for him. He does not perfectly fit the trope of non-white villain. And Uncle Iroh- I have a hard time viewing him as an antagonist in any sense. Come to think of it, I would argue that the moral (ultimately) in Avatar: The Last Airbender, is that our assumptions about other cultures are limiting, and that a world where people preserve separation of culture while respecting one another and living harmoniously is the ideal.

    I think the bashing of this show and this movie can ease up a bit, honestly. I have become weary of this wolf in critical thinking's clothing. The social integrity of this movie still has the potential to outshine the vast majority of mainstream american culture.

    ~Jesse

    ReplyDelete
  5. I would argue that Zuko (and Iroh, but to a lesser extent) are villains in the first season. They aren't the worst antagonists, but I do think they are antagonists. And this movie is just the first season.

    I agree that this whitewashing does not ruin the potential of the movie, but I also think it was a really dumb first move. I hope you are right, and that it is their only dumb move, but if it is an indication of what is to come, it will really be a shame. Fingers crossed, eh.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Tabs: Yeah, in addition to the claims of "choosing the best actor regardless of color" issue, people have been using the fact that it's a fictional universe to justify saying things like "Their races aren't real, so they can be played by people of any race!" Bullshit.

    I really want to give them the benefit of the doubt about the casting being forced upon them by the studios for accessibility reasons. But that wouldn't solve any problems, would it?

    Road Wave is right, there's a whole pile of bullshit surrounding the casting that I barely began to dig into. For instance:

    "We want you to dress in traditional cultural ethnic attire," [the casting director] said. "If you're Korean, wear a kimono. If you're from Belgium, wear lederhosen."

    WOMP WOMP

    Mark: I agree with some of your thoughts. I think Aang is the best-cast lead, and being mixed-race, his role is not [i]terribly[/i] whitewashed. However, Zuko...well, while I agree that he's by far the most dynamic and interesting character in the show, a two-hour movie is probably going to cut out a lot of that development. At least for this movie, which is based solely on Book 1, he will likely be portrayed as a Brown Evil Dude (except for the Blue Spirit, maybe).

    Anyway, how about this: I think Dev Patel would have made a fantastic Sokka. Why wasn't he cast as the skinny, scrappy, awkward, wise-cracking, dark-skinned protagonist?

    http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_WIHMX0rwOpM/Sh9yxO3AyMI/AAAAAAAAWOg/5QTMmsba5Nw/s400/dev_patel.jpg

    Food for thought.

    Jesse: Well...regarding everything you said about Zuko, I gave my thoughts just now. I totally agree about the biggest overarching theme in Avatar being "don't make assumptions or generalizations about cultures" - but again, in Book 1, the Fire Nation is almost entirely antagonistic. Though they are portrayed in a much more reasonable light later in the series, their early villainy will be the first impression given to a large percentage of the audience.

    There's no need to bash the show, in my mind. I see it as nothing but an homage to the cultures in question, and an extremely well-informed and non-stereotyped one at that. Then again, I didn't read Tabs' comments as anti-show, only anti-movie. Correct me if I'm wrong...?

    I guess I'll say that my overall position is not one of outrage, but disappointment. It is not any kind of new or ground-breaking racism - just a HUGE missed opportunity to change some of the current Hollywood racial trends for the better.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Yeah, Zuko is admittedly pretty bad in the first book...but I don't think there was ever any intention of just making the first book. I guess the jury's still out for me until I see if the movie gives him the complexity and depth he had in the show, and at least a LITTLE bit in the first book.

    And your argument for Patel to play Sokka is pretty damn solid (even though it's just a picture, albeit a very convincing one). The only thing I'd say in response is that if the lead actor of a "Best Picture" Academy Award winning film was showing interest in my movie, I'd try to give him the biggest role possible. Unless of course it was Elijah Wood. Or Tom Cruise.

    In any case, I'll be seeing this movie on opening day in my Appa costume with my fingers crossed that it's acceptably good!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Even with character development cut, you would have to completely rewrite the fire nation characters in that season to make them unlikable. The Southern Air Temple: Iroh and Zuko versus Zhao. Seeing Zuko side by side with Zhao, you root for Zuko. The Storm: You get to understand Zuko's motivations, his exile as a result of his personal integrity, the side that values every human life. In the Siege of the North, you get to hear him rant about his demons, his history, his family, his philosophy. You connect with him. And there are moments like that throughout the first twenty episodes. That's antihero, antagonist or not. And definitely, if the first-time viewers of the show don't like Uncle Iroh, or Zuko for that matter, they did not make it right. And what about Jong Jong? He was in the first season. I wouldn't try to exonerate the method of casting; I do think they missed out on a wonderful opportunity, but I'm still waiting to see how this plays out.

    The casting of white Sokka and Katara with an otherwise non-white water tribe is highly suspect, and I'm still horrified at some of the anecdotes I read about the casting call. I agree that this is a Hollywood blunder, and it is a good representation of the low social standard for film.

    If no bash was intended for the show, I swallow most of the defensive statements I made. I consider myself pretty discerning when it comes to media and identity politics, and Avatar is very dear to me.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Road Wave LaChanceJune 14, 2010 at 10:00 PM

    Yes, Zuko and Iroh are better than Zhao. But in any scene they share with Our Heros™ in the first season/book/movie, they are definitely the bad guys. Having some bad guys be preferable to other bad guys is not the same as good guys, and I still think the, er, brownwashing of the fire nation is pretty bad for that reason.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Can we all at least agree to never use the word "brownwashing" again?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Oh hey, another frustrating thing about the adaptation that I forgot to mention in my original post: remember that meticulously fact-checked Chinese calligraphy in the series? The movie is replacing that with a new nonsense language, further distancing their version of the Avatar universe from its Asiatic roots.

    "I just received words from the movie producers. They are not going to use Chinese calligraphy at all, replacing it with unreadable symbols. I won't be participating in the movie. It is not only a disappointment on the cast. They are removing all the successful elements of the original TV series. I think that would keep a lot of Asian audience away. I am disappointed to learn that the Avatar movie has removed the successful cultural elements of the original Avatar TV series. Whether this is a right decision will be seen in the box office."

    - Professor Siu-Leung Lee, cultural consultant, Avatar: The Last Airbender

    ReplyDelete
  12. I guess I agree with Road Wave. Fire nation is the only aggressor, and the only dark-skinned race (problematic). Preserving the depth of those characters and keeping them somewhat sympathetic would be true to the show, though. Prince Zuko is no Jafar from Aladdin.

    Does anyone know how earth kingdom will be portrayed?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Shyamalan has assured us that the Earth Kingdom (including Toph!!) will be made up of East Asian people, with a portion of the population being black, "because it's such a big country and land...you could have some diversity in there as they travel through the cities."

    ReplyDelete
  14. 1) That's a dumb quote, Patrick.

    2) I wasn't attacking the show itself, Jesse. Just the casting style. I do agree that Aang is fucking cool and definitely a good choice, as well as Zuko.

    I should say that I don't watch the show on a regular/chronological(...?) basis. I was just responding to Patrick's post. I did say the show was created by peeps with Western (..Earthly) lenses, mostly as a way of calling 'bullshit,' as Patrick did to the "but it's fantasy! Race isn't there!" response. I agree that the show's creators, NOT THE HOLLYWOOD PEOPLE, were definitely careful -- and respectful, paying homage, as was said, to their sources, rather than bending and twisting them into stereotypes, &c.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I like what you're saying, Tabitha. The movie makers really weren't thinking about the implications of their casting. It's disappointing that they couldn't keep the original influences of the show's style integrated. I hope Earth Kingdom can be done reasonably, in a way that is somewhat redeeming for the present racial portrayal. Dev would have been a good Sokka (though Zuko is my favorite and I am excited about Dev for selfish reasons).

    Is this a blog or a forum?

    ReplyDelete
  16. A forum with extremely strict thread moderation.

    ReplyDelete
  17. i'll thread your moderation

    ReplyDelete
  18. Patrick. Can we create a blog for the Meats?

    ReplyDelete
  19. Solid post, Patrick. Enjoyed reading it.

    I very nearly wrote (some variation of) "meat meat meat" or "gib gib gib" -- and then I wondered if I should contribute something of value to the thread. I couldn't decide.

    Gip gip gip!

    ReplyDelete
  20. I ain't want you to feel pressure or anything, but I really enjoy your writing, and would love to see another post. Even if you just talk about what you ate for breakfast, I would like to read about it.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Gosh, you're right. It has been quite a while, hasn't it? Anonymous, I promise you I will write an entry sometime this week.

    And...maybe not every post has to be some kind of "important" discussion.

    P.S.: The Last Airbender was a pretty awful movie.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Yeah I guess none of the race stuff bothers me now that I know how unimportant this movie was.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I referenced this post in my latest entry, which does no justice to the quality of your writing by the way. When will you write more??

    ReplyDelete